https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/trafficandcommuting/southwest-passenger-who-died-following-explosion-was-sucked-halfway-outside-the-plane/2018/04/19/277956fe-43eb-11e8-bba2-0976a82b05a2_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.1fe6195f6727

Explain in detail.

Are the 3 elements of recovery present in this case, under Tort law?

1. Plaintiff suffered harm

2. Defendant's act or failure to act caused the harm

3. Defendant's act or failure to act was a breach of duty.

Which liability rule should be used?

a) No liability

b) Strict liability

c) Simple negligence

d) Negligence + Contributory negligence

e) Strict liability + Contributory negligence

f) Comparative negligence

Does this case have the potential to move from tort law into criminal law? Explain.

In what ways does this case, and the way it's handled in the courts, have the potential to change travelers' or airline companies' activities in the future?