I have 21 questions similar to this asking for the population propotion, the test statistic, and correlations

Fifty-four wild bears were anesthetized, and then their weights and chest sizes were measured and listed in a data set. Results are shown in the accompanying display. Is there sufficient Correlation Results evidence to support the claim that there is a linear correlation between the weights of bears and their chest sizes? When measuring an anesthetized bear, is it easier to measure chest size than weight? If so, does it appear that a measured chest size can be used to predict the weight? Use a significance level of a = 0.05. Correlation coeff, r: 0.959659 Critical r: +0.2680855 P-value (two tailed): 0.000 Is there sufficient evidence to support the claim that there is a linear correlation between the weights of bears and their chest sizes? Choose the correct answer below and, if necessary, fill in the answer box within your choice. (Round to three decimal places as needed.) O A. Yes, because the test statistic falls between the critical values. O B. No, because the absolute value of the test statistic |exceeds the critical value. O C. No, because the test statistic |falls between the critical values. O D. Yes, because the absolute value of the test statistic exceeds the critical value. O E. The answer cannot be determined from the given information. When measuring an anesthetized bear, is it easier to measure chest size than weight? If so, does it appear that a measured chest size can be used to predict the weight