I need help with this

Assume that two individuals have entered into a contract for the sale of \"screws." The buyer of the item mistakenly thinks the term "screws" means just Phillips-head screws, when in fact the term really means any standard type of screw including at-head screws. The seller believes he is fullling the contract when he ships both Phillips- and at-head screws to the buyer. ff the buyer can show a court that he alone made an honest mistake regarding the meaning of the term "screws" when entering into the agreement and that the non-mistaken party (i.e., the seller) had no reason to know about the mistake to take advantage of it, the contract will likely be voided (i.e., rescinded or cancelled) under a theory of unilateral mistake rather than the contract being reformed (he, rewriting the contract's agreement). 0 True 0 False