IDEA was what the challenge of this case was under. Looking at IDEA you can see there are four main components. The first is the general proposals. This looks at hiring individuals with disabilities, definitions of it and programs available to these individuals. The second section of IDEA is looking at provisions for everyone being able to receive a free and public education. This also allows kids to attend school if they have a disability up to the age of 21. The third part is aiding and early intervention programs to individuals with disabilities. The last part is providing programs to parents, technology assistance and more to individuals with disabilities. This law is what the challenge was formed under, and it was under the ability of receiving a free and appropriate education in the least restrictive environment. IDEA 2004 states that "disability is a natural part of the human experience and in no way diminishes the right of individuals to participate in or contribute to society. Improving educational results for children with disabilities is an essential element of our national policy of ensuring equality of opportunity, full participation, independent living, and economic self-sufficiency for individuals with disabilities." (Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 2024) This case aligns with IDEA because they came back and said that the school provided what they could and they were great sources