This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssignment Content Possible Points = 90 Points Exemplars An exemplar is defined as a prior assignment completed in the FNP program that you feel is a good reflection of the work you have accomplished while a graduate student. Typically, it\'s an assignment that you may have enjoyed completing, learned something new from, or did well academically. Think of it as your \"best work. Each exemplar should be at least 300-500 words. | 10pts Excellent Outstanding work. At least 10 high-quality exemplars are chosen from prior written assignments completed while in the NP program. Exemplars are unique and diverse. | 9pts V. Good All exemplars are present, but information lacking in some areas. Overall, well written and comprehensive. Only minor areas left out. | 8pts Satisfactory All exemplars are present, but work lacking in important areas. Exemplars are more similar than they are diverse (i.e. choosing the same type of assignment from each course), and may not represent a good sample of the work completed in the NP program. | 5pts Needs Improvement Missing one or more exemplars. Or, the majority of chosen exemplars are the same (i.e. all reflections or all discussions). Or, information not complete nor in students own words | 0pts Unsatisfactory Large areas missing in information. OR Assignment, as written, is not reflective of graduate-level thought or writing. | | 10pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentify and Explain Identify which Chamberlain Program Outcomes, MSN Essentials, and/or NONPF Competencies have been met for each exemplar. Provide a brief explanation of why each identified outcome, essential, and/or NONPF competency has been met. Each program outcome, MSN essential, and NONPF competency listed in the assignment instructions must be addressed at least one time between all of the exemplars that are submitted. This section should be at least 250 words or greater for each exemplar. | 35pts Excellent Outstanding work on all elements. For each exemplar, identification of Chamberlain Program Outcomes, MSN Essentials, and or NONPF Competencies has occurred. Each outcome, essential, or competency has a well-written and comprehensive explanation of why each has been met. Each program outcome, MSN essential, and NONPF competency listed in the assignment instructions has been addressed at least one time between all of the exemplars that have been submitted. A grid has been included as an appendix detailing which outcomes / essentials / competencies were met by each exemplar. | 32pts V. Good All elements are present. For each exemplar, identification of Chamberlain Program Outcomes, MSN Essentials, and or NONPF Competencies has occurred. Each outcome, essential, or competency has a well-written and comprehensive explanation of why each has been met. Each program outcome, MSN essential, and NONPF competency listed in the assignment instructions has been addressed at least one time between all of the exemplars that have been submitted. A grid has been included as an appendix detailing which outcomes / essentials / competencies were met by each exemplar. Overall, well written and comprehensive. Only minor areas left out. | 29pts Satisfactory May be missing an element, or information is incomplete. Otherwise, contains all characteristics described in the Excellent or Very Good categories. | 18pts Needs Improvement Missing more than one element or information not complete. Or, the identification and explanation of how program outcomes, MSN essentials, or NONPF Competencies were met for each exemplar are unclear or poorly written. | 0pts Unsatisfactory Large areas missing in information. OR Assignment, as written, is not reflective of graduate-level thought or writing. OR Assignment, as written, is not reflective of graduate-level thought or writing. | | 35pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConnect Identify at least two concepts in each exemplar. Provide a theoretical or operational definition of each concept and examine how they are interrelated and interconnected. Transfer all concepts identified into a concept map. | 35pts Excellent Outstanding work. At least 2 concepts identified for each exemplar, for a total of 20 concepts. Operational or theoretical definition provided for each concept. All concepts transferred to a graphic concept map. | 32pts V. Good Outstanding work. At least 2 concepts identified for each exemplar, for a total of 20 concepts. Operational or theoretical definition provided for each concept. All concepts transferred to a graphic concept map. | 29pts Satisfactory At least 2 concepts identified for each exemplar, for a total of 20 concepts. Operational or theoretical definition provided for each concept. All concepts transferred to a graphic concept map. May be missing an element, or information is incomplete. | 18pts Needs Improvement Missing one or more concepts. Or, missing one or more theoretical or operational definitions. Or, concepts and/or definitions are unclear or poorly written. Concept map poorly developed. | 0pts Unsatisfactory Large areas missing in information. OR Assignment, as written, is not reflective of graduate-level thought or writing. OR Concept map not included | | 35pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflect Reflect on how you have met the program outcomes, MSN Essentials, or NONPF Competencies for each exemplar and explain how it has transformed you as a prospective masters-prepared advanced practice nurse. Each reflection (1 per exemplar) should be approximately 150-250 words. | 10pts Excellent Succinct and clear reflection written at the graduate level and reflective of synthesis and/or evaluation. Outstanding organization. | 9pts V. Good Clear reflection written at the graduate level and partially reflective of synthesis and/or evaluation. | 8pts Satisfactory Reflection partially unclear or somewhat superficial in its examination and is not reflective of synthesis. | 5pts Needs Improvement Reflection unclear. Insufficient depth to reflect either analysis or synthesis. | 0pts Unsatisfactory Not organized. No clear reflection of learning or transformative experience. OR Assignment, as written, is not reflective of graduate-level thought or writing. OR Assignment, as written, is not reflective of graduate-level thought or writing. | | 10pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssignment Format Possible Points = 10 Points Mechanics of Writing / APA Format Completes assignment in accordance with the standards of the latest edition of the American Psychological Association (APA) Publication Manual | 10pts Excellent APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation are accurate, or with zero errors. | 9pts V. Good APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation are accurate, or with 1 error. | 8pts Satisfactory 2-3 errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted. | 5pts Needs Improvement 4 errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted. | 0pts Unsatisfactory 5 or more errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted OR Assignment, as written, is not reflective of graduate-level thought or writing. OR Assignment, as written, is not reflective of graduate-level thought or writing. | | 10pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate penalty deductions Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment. Quizzes and discussions are not considered assignments and are not part of the late assignment policy. | 0pts Manual deductions | 0pts Manual deductions | | 0pts |
Total Points:100 |