Im struggling with the case of Lucy v. Zehmer, 196 Va. 493, 84 S.E.2d 516 (1954).

How does intoxication apply to this case?Does the court look at objective indications of intoxication? Explain. Do Lucy and Zehmer have an enforceable contract? Why or why not? Is there sometimes a different emphasis in the cases that concern lack of capacity on the ground of intoxication than in the cases that concern lack of capacity on other grounds? If a person is intoxicated enough to lack mental capacity, can a contract be entered into at the time be voidable at his or her option? Do you agree or disagree with the outcome of this case? Why?