In 2010, Sasha was hired as the Executive Assistant to the CEO of Organization X. Sasha has been a wonderful employee foIn 2010, Sasha was hired as the Executive Assistant to the CEO of Organization X. Sasha has been a wonderful employee for the past 13+ years, but she is moving to Portland, Oregon to be closer to her ailing parents. Sasha has given her notice but will be working for another six weeks. Barak, who is Sasha's colleague, is convinced that he knows every activity that Sasha engages in. He told your colleague, the HR recruiter, that Sasha's job description is up to date. Your colleague takes Barak's word and posts the job description.

Explain what HR processes were overlooked and, too, the impact of taking Barak's word rather than engaging in due diligence. Specifically, address the following:

1. Why was it wrong to post the job description? What should have been done first? Why?
2. What might occur if the job description is inaccurate? Explain short- and long-term consequences.
3. Explain how this situation could have been handled better. What job analysis methods and sources should have been utilized, if any, before posting this job description?