In Berghuis v. Thompkins, 130 S.Ct. 2250 (2010), the United States Supreme Court addressed which of the following issues regarding the rights of a suspect under interrogation? Group of answer choices That during a custodial interrogation a suspect must explicitly invoke their Miranda rights; prolonged silence followed by answering questions is not enough That silence is not a waiver of Miranda, but silence can invoke Miranda That a suspect's silence for more than 50% of the interrogation is tantamount to invoking one's Miranda rights That a suspect being willing to talk for more than 50% of the interrogation is tantamount to an explicit waiver of their Miranda rights