In contrast to the American system of medical malpractice, some countries have adopted no-fault systems of compensation for medical injuries. The Is "No-Fault" the Cure for the Medical Liability Crisis? article provides a brief explanation of some of these systems, as well as competing perspectives on whether the U.S. system should move in this direction. In your view, what would be the primary advantages and drawbacks of replacing our fault-based system of liability with a no-fault system such as that currently applied in Sweden and New Zealand? Would you support such a change?