In February, Chuck orally agrees to sell his hunting cabin, with $15$ acres, to Kyle for $$35,000,$ with the deal to be completed in July, when Kyle will have the money. In March, while Chuck is vacationing on his land, he permits Kyle to enter the land and dig the foundation for a new cottage$.$ In July, Kyle arrives with the money, but Chuck refuses to sell. Kyle sues and asks the court to require Chuck to sell the property as promised.

Chuck wins because the contract was never put in writing.

Kyle wins because Chuck has committed fraud.

Chuck wins because the contract terms were unclear.

Kyle wins because a contract for vacation property does not need to be written.