Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

) In Harksen v Lane 1998 (1) SA 300 (CC) section 21 was challenged in the Constitutional Court. In this case, Harksen argued that section

) In Harksen v Lane 1998 (1) SA 300 (CC) section 21 was challenged in the Constitutional Court. In this case, Harksen argued that section 21 infringed her rights in the equality guarantee in section 8 of Interim Constitution and the property guarantee contained in section 28 of the Interim Constitution (respectively sections 9 and 25 of the final 1996 Constitution). Provide the reasons why the Constitutional Court found that section 21 did not infringe section 28 of the Interim Constitutions. In your answer, only discuss the court's reasons regarding section 28 of the Interim Constitution and not section 8.

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Land Law

Authors: Mark Davys

11th Edition

1352005190, 978-1352005196

More Books

Students also viewed these Law questions

Question

98. For a compound random variable S = N i=1 Xi , find Cov(N, S).

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

5. Give examples of binary thinking.

Answered: 1 week ago