In Hinson v$.$ N&W Construction, where Hinson submitted the low bid to N&W for plumbing work to be part of a larger construction project by N&W$,$ but then refused to do the work when construction was started by N&W$,$ the court held that Hinson:

a$.$ none of the other choices

b$.$ was not liable because there was not a contract due to lack of proper acceptance by N&W

c$.$ was not liable because there was no consideration paid by N&W to create a contract

d$.$ was liable to N&W for the value of the contract based on a breach of contract

e$.$ could not be relied upon by N&W because he was not licensed for such work