Question
In June of 2021, the United States Supreme Court issued a 6-3 opinion on a case dealing with the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA).
In June of 2021, the United States Supreme Court issued a 6-3 opinion on a case dealing with the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA). The case dealt with the heart of the act, and how legislation for computer crimes doesn't necessarily reflect the former, current, or future uses of technology. Regardless of how the opinion could be viewed, it is unquestionably a major departure from the case law regarding computer crimes. In this discussion, provide some insight into how this decision is different, why you believe the SCOTUS broke from precedent, and what this means for how computer crimes are prosecuted.
Review the Van Buren v. United States Download Van Buren v. United Statescase. (PDF) https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/19-783_k53l.pdf
After reading the case and reflecting on , answers the following:
- How is this decision different from previous cases regarding the CFAA?
- Did the SCOTUS break from precedent on this? If so, why?
- How does this change the way computer crimes can be prosecuted in the future, if at all?
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started
Andersons Business Law and the Legal Environment
Authors: David p. twomey, Marianne moody Jennings
21st Edition
1111400547, 324786662, 978-1111400545, 978-0324786668
