In November 2009, the U.S. Supreme Court published an opinion (Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission(https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/citizens-united-v-federal-election-commission/) that overturned 2 prior judicial opinions and declared statutory limits on independent political spending (spending other than donations made directly to the candidates themselves) unconstitutional. The Court reasoned that these limits on corporate giving violated free expression.

1. What dangers do you see in this decision?What advantages do you see?
2. Based on our study of the first amendment, do you agree with this decision? Why or why not?

Include opinions supported by theacademic theory being covered.Illustrate your understanding ofthe first amendmentcases that westudied. Read the opinion and other information in the links entitled "Summary of Citizens United v. Federal Elections Commission(https://www.cga.ct.gov/2010/rpt/2010-R-0124.htm)" and "Citizens United v. Federal Elections Commission(https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/citizens-united-v-federal-election-commission/)".