In the case of Cooke v. Fresh Express Foods Corporation, Inc.:

a. the defendants were required to purchase plaintiffs shares as a remedy for their misconduct at their fair market value.

b. a finding by the court that a majority of shareholders have engaged in oppressive conduct will result in an order for dissolution of the corporation.

c. a court may dissolve a corporation in a proceeding brought by a shareholder if the actions of the directors are oppressive.

d. siphoning off corporate wealth by paying the majority shareholders excessively high compensation is evidence of oppressive conduct.