In the case of Employment Division v$.$ Smith $(1990),$ what was the outcome regarding the use of peyote for sacramental purposes?

The Free Exercise Clause allowed the use of peyote but only for certain religious groups

The Free Exercise Clause did not apply to the use of peyote and the case was dismissed

The Free Exercise Clause allowed the use of peyote and respondents were granted unemployment benefits

The Free Exercise Clause did not excuse the use of peyote and respondents were denied unemployment benefits