Question
In the case of Ultramares Corporation v. Touche , 174 N.E. 441 (1932). This case addresses an accountant's liability to third parties.There are three theories
In the case of UltramaresCorporation v. Touche, 174 N.E. 441 (1932). This case addresses an accountant's liability to third parties.There are three theories of accountant's liability that you will need to know for the CPA exam. The first is the Ultramares Rule (also known as the New York Rule). What are the other two? Which rule is followed by most states with respect to accountant's liability to third parties?
Apply the other theories of accountant's liability to the fact pattern in Ultramares. Would the court have ruled the same in the other two theories? Would the accountant be found liable under the other two theories of accountant's liabilities to third parties? Why or why not?
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started
Smith and Roberson Business Law
Authors: Richard A. Mann, Barry S. Roberts
15th Edition
1285141903, 1285141903, 9781285141909, 978-0538473637
