Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

In the Foister case where 7 plaintiffs admitted that they misused the product (the drug, OxyContin), the court held; a.A product is not unreasonably dangerous

In the Foister case where 7 plaintiffs admitted that they misused the product (the drug, OxyContin), the court held;

a.A product is not unreasonably dangerous simply because they may be harmful or illegally used.

b.The manufacturer put clear warnings on each prescription container stating how they should be taken.

c.It is the physician that has a legal responsibility to warn a patient and the pharmaceutical/drug company only need warn the physician.

d.The plaintiffs did not present any proof that the drug was unreasonably dangerous absent its illegal alteration and use.

e.All of the above are currently being emphasized.

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

ISE Operations And Supply Chain Management

Authors: F. Robert Jacobs, Richard B. Chase

16th International Edition

1260575942, 978-1260575941

More Books

Students also viewed these General Management questions

Question

The importance of ethics in international marketing

Answered: 1 week ago