Question
In the Foister case where 7 plaintiffs admitted that they misused the product (the drug, OxyContin), the court held; a.A product is not unreasonably dangerous
In the Foister case where 7 plaintiffs admitted that they misused the product (the drug, OxyContin), the court held;
a.A product is not unreasonably dangerous simply because they may be harmful or illegally used.
b.The manufacturer put clear warnings on each prescription container stating how they should be taken.
c.It is the physician that has a legal responsibility to warn a patient and the pharmaceutical/drug company only need warn the physician.
d.The plaintiffs did not present any proof that the drug was unreasonably dangerous absent its illegal alteration and use.
e.All of the above are currently being emphasized.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started