Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

in Weissman v. City of New York 860 N.Y.S. 2d 393 (City of N.Y. Civil Court 2009), a legal case concerning Ken Weissman's missing boating

in Weissman v. City of New York 860 N.Y.S. 2d 393 (City of N.Y. Civil Court 2009), a legal case concerning Ken Weissman's missing boating equipment (stolen kayaks). the relevant historical facts are described as such:

In 2005, Ken Weissman rented storage space at the West 79th Street Boat Basin which is owned and operated by the City of New York Parks & Recreation Department. The written agreement contained an exculpatory clause that stated: "I understand that the City of New York Parks & Recreation department will not be responsible for any damages incurred to my vessel while at the dinghy dock or while in the facility at the 79th Street Boat Basin, and that I store my vessel at my own risk. The policy and practice at the facility was that users would store their vessels in an enclosed cage-like structure that had storage bins. Each user had a key to the storage area and had unrestricted access. Within the cage, users could further secure their vessels to the bin with their own devices such as chain and lock. In 2007, Weissman had two brand-new kayaks stolen from the caged area. The lock to the caged area was intact but his kayaks and locks were missing. Weissman reported this theft to the police, staff, and management. He indicated to the Boat Basin that he was no longer going to use the facility because of the theft. The manager of the facility spoke to him and urged him to continue to use the facility because they were changing their practice and policy by adding more security measures. Only West 79th Street Boat Basin employees would have keys to the caged storage area. Users no longer had unrestricted access and would have to get an employee to escort them, open the lock, and admit them to the storage area. Security cameras were going to be installed. The Boat Basin posted a notice with the new changes, which said: "Attention Kayak Owners: Please see marina staff to gain access to kayak storage area. We have had a security issue and have temporarily changed the locks. We will be adding security cameras to the area shortly. We apologize for any inconvenience in the meantime. Based on the assurances by the manager that the security would be better, Weissman purchased two used kayaks and again stored them in the caged area. He and the others no longer had keys to the area and had to be admitted and escorted by an employee to access the vessels in the storage area. On or about July 23, 2007, a week after the first two kayaks were stolen, one of Weissman's replacement kayaks, which cost $1,400, was missing from the storage area. He filed a notice of claim and then brought suit against the City of New York, seeking the value of the missing kayak and a refund of the unused portion of the storage fee.

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

Based on the provided facts from Weissman v City of New York heres an analysis of the legal issues involved and potential outcomes Exculpatory Clause The written agreement between Ken Weissman and the ... blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image_2

Step: 3

blur-text-image_3

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Basic Contract Law For Paralegals

Authors: Jeffrey A. Helewitz

9th Edition

1454896280, 978-1454896289

More Books

Students also viewed these Law questions