In which of the following fact patterns is Defendant's motion to suppress the evidence most likely to be granted?

A - Defendant was staying at a hotel, but was two weeks behind on his room charges. The hotel desk clerk permitted the police to search the Defendant's room while he was out. The police found contraband in the room of which the Defendant was subsequently charged with possession.

B - Defendant was riding in a car stopped by Baxter. Police stopped the car and asked to see Baxter's driver's license. After Baxter showed it to them, the asked his permission to search the car. Baxter said, "Sure, go ahead." Upon searching under the seat in which Defendant had been sitting, the police found a package of heroin which was offered at Defendant's trial for illegally possessing narcotics.

C - Defendant was arrested for driving while intoxicated. After he was taken to jail, his car was towed to the police auto impound. There, a police officer taking inventory of the card's contents found a weapon in the car which had been used in the commission of a crime with which Defendant was subsequently charged.

D - While Defendant was driving, police officers stopped him for going through a red light. A routine check of his license through the police department computer indicated that a bench warrant had been issued for his arrest for failing to appear in connection with four parking tickets which had been issued to vehicles registered to him. The officers advised him that he was under arrest. Although they did not handcuff him, they ordered him to empty his pockets onto the hood of the police car. A one gram piece of cocaine which was in one of the pockets was later offered against him at his trial for possession of controlled substance.