In Yazdianpour v. Safeblood Technologies, Inc. The United States Court of Appeals, 8th Circuit, reversed the U.S. District Court finding that the plaintiff (Yazdianpour) had a rightful claim of intentional misrepresentation.

(1)Of the necessary elements of the tort of intentional misrepresentation, which element, regarding the recipient's (plaintiff's) actions, was most pivotal to the 8th Circuit's decision?

(2) What primary element required for the tort in Yazdianpour v. Safeblood Technologies, Inc is not required for the tort at issue in the case of Squish La Fish v. Thomco Speciality Products?

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

The Answer is in the image, click to view ... View the full answer