In your own discussion post, remember to answer both questions! Prompt: You have now listened to Joy James (2019) argument for abolition. You have also read Mcleod's (2019) argument, as well as Wright's (2020). First, Which argument for abolition do you find most convincing? Paraphrase the argument (with page number citation). Second, why do you find that particular argument for abolition compelling? Make your case. Either way, you must provide evidence (for every argument you make) using credible citations [per your week two course materials]. Keep track of how many arguments you are making in your discussion post. Students often lose track of what they set out to say. Focus on writing one strong argument per discussion post. Reminder: You are not required to provide any additional or extra citations. Simply citing this week's reading is enough. However, in political science, you cannot make claims of fact without providing a citation. If your argument requires it, you may need to include extra citations to make a legitimate argument. Regardless, every argument requires proof of evidence via citation. At the bottom of your discussion post, please list any citations you use. You must provide the complete citation in APA format for each citation, and your citations must be in alphabetical order. Examples of what you could cite: my videos, other academic presentations, peer-reviewed articles, newspaper citations, think tank reports, statistical institute reports, or magazine citations. Go back to "week two" in the course materials module if you are unsure if your citation is credible. Remember, blogs are not reliable or credible citations. Even if it is an academic blog. Reviewed