(issue, rule, facts, conclusion for each question please)

Steven Tarerka purchased a new Ford Mustang from a Ford Dealer.More than two years later, after Tarerka had put 75,000 miles on the car Ford's express warranty had expired, he discovered that the taillight assembly gaskets on his Mustang had been installed in such a way that water was permitted to enter the taillight assembly, causing rust to form.Even though the rusting problem was a recurrent one of which Ford was aware, Ford did nothing for Tarerka.Was for liable to Tarerka under the implied warranty of merchantabilty?

Richard Jimenez was injured when a disc for a handled electric disc grinder he had purchased from Sear Roebuck shattered while he used the grinder to smooth down a steel weld.When Jimenez brought a strict liability lawsuit against Sears, the defendant argued that he had misused the grinder, and that his misuse caused his injury.Assuming that Sears was right, what effect would this have in a jurisdiction that has not adopted comparative or comparative fault?

Connie Daniel attempted to commit suicide by locking herself inside the trunk of her Ford car.She remained in the trunk for nine days, but survived after finally being rescued.Later, Daniel brought a negligence suit against Ford in an effort to recover for her resulting injuries.She contended that the car was defectively designed because the trunk did not have an internal release or opening mechanism.She also argued that Ford was liable for negligently failing to warn her that the trunk could not be unlocked from within.Was Ford liable for negligent design and/or negligent failure to warn?