"...It is right for present purposes to regard the typical cases of private nuisance as being those concerned with interference with the enjoyment of land and as such generally actionable [only] by a person with a right in the land..." per Lord Goff of Chievely.

Analyse the effect of this dictum in the law of nuisance.

this question deals with private nuisance and the ruling in Hunter v Canary Wharf Ltd. (1997). I would like further explanation of the dictum.