Question
Jason Kidwell is considering whether to acquire a local toy manufacturing company, Toys n Things Inc. The companys annual income statements for three years are
Jason Kidwell is considering whether to acquire a local toy manufacturing company, Toys n Things Inc. The companys annual income statements for three years are as follows:
| 2013 | 2012 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
b. The current owner of Toysn Things indicated to Jason that he would not take less than five times 2014 EBITDA to sell out. Jason decides that, based on what he knows about the company, the price could not be justified. However, upon further investigation, Jason learns that the owners wife is paid $100,000 a year for administrative services that Jason thinks could be done by a $50,000-per-year assistant. Moreover, the owner pays himself a salary of $250,000 per year to run the business, which Jason thinks is at least $50,000 too high based on the demands of the business. In addition, Jason thinks that, by outsourcing raw materials to Asia, he can reduce the firms cost of goods sold by 10%. After making adjustments for excessive salaries, what value should Jason place on the business? Can Jason justify the value the owner is placing on the business?
Given | |||||
Shares outstanding | 9.40 | million | |||
Offering Price 10/16/02 | $ 12.25 | ||||
Exhibit P6-12.3 | |||||
Dick's Sporting Goods Financial Data ($ millions) | |||||
Revenues | $ 1,173.794 | ||||
Gross Profit | $ 298.453 | ||||
EBIT | $ 55.899 | ||||
Depreciation & Amortization | $ 13.499 | ||||
EBITDA | $ 69.398 | ||||
Balance Sheet Data 8/3/02 | |||||
Checks Drawn | $ 33.584 | ||||
Current Portion of Long Term Debt | $ 0.211 | ||||
Revolving Bank Line of Credit | $ 90.299 | ||||
Long Term Debt & Capital Leases | $ 3.466 | ||||
Total Debt | $ 127.560 | ||||
Cash | $ 13.874 | ||||
Stockholder's Equity | $ 78.984 | ||||
Debt/Capitalization | 62% | ||||
Debt/EBITDA | 1.84x | ||||
Source: Dick's Sporting Goods Prospectus S-1 dated September 27, 2002 | |||||
Solution | |||||
a. Implied Enterprise Valuation for DKS Based on Market Comparables | |||||
Average Comps | DKS Statistic | Implied EV | |||
Revenue Multiple | 0.37x | $ 1,173.794 | $ 434.304 | ||
EBITDA Multiple | 5.20x | $ 69.398 | $ 360.870 | ||
EBIT Multiple | 8.30x | $ 55.899 | $ 463.962 | ||
b. Determine DKS' Implied Equity Value by subtracting Net Debt | |||||
Implied Enterprise Value | DKS Net Debt | Implied Equity Value | Implied IPO Value Per Share | ||
Revenue Multiple | $ 434.304 | $ (113.686) | $ 320.618 | $ 34.11 | |
EBITDA Multiple | $ 360.870 | $ (113.686) | $ 247.184 | $ 26.30 | |
EBIT Multiple | $ 463.962 | $ (113.686) | $ 350.276 | $ 37.26 | |
Dick's IPO priced at $12.25. Its market multiples were valued at a significant discount to the comparables. | |||||
Equity Market Capitalization based on 9.47 million shares | ?????????? | ||||
DKS Net Debt | ?????????? | ||||
DKS Enterprise Value at IPO actual price of $12.25 | ?????????? | ||||
Implied Multiple based on IPO Price | Discount to Comps | ||||
EV/Revenue Multiple | ?????????? | ?????????? | |||
EV/EBITDA Multiple | ?????????? | ?????????? | |||
EV/EBIT Multiple | ?????????? | ?????????? | |||
Analysis: ?????????? | |||||
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started