Johns Manville, a fiber glass production company, sent out an email on January $4$ requesting that all employees not go to work for a competing fiberglass producer. Recently, several start$-$ups had begun to challenge Johns Manville's dominance in the fiber glass industry. However, after receiving a good job offer from a competing fiber glass producer, Glassfiber Inc., Bill decided to quit his job at Johns Manville to work for Glassfiber. jill had read the email Johns Manville had sent on January $4.$ Johns Manville sued Bill for having broken an impliedcontract. Johns Manville argued in court that once the email had been sent, Bill was under obligation to not go work for a competitor because he was being paid by Johns Manville at he time Bill read the email. The court ruled in favor of Bill, concluding that no contract had ever been created, and the email did not constitute an enforceable contract.

But what if the facts of the case were different? Select each set of facts below that could change the case's outcome.