Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, in his written opinion of the Schenck case said, $$When a nation is at war many things that might be said in time of peace are such a hindrance to its effort that their utterance will not be endured so long as men fight, and that no court could regard them as protected by any constitutional right.$$ Holmes, in this opinion, is describing the following in denying First Amendment speech protections to Charles Schenck:

Group of answer choices

prior restraint

actual malice

ordinary scrutiny

fighting words

a clear and present danger