Justin is playing with his daughter Amelia in a public park. A stranger runs up to Amelia, grabs her, and tries to carry her to this car. Justin chases him down, pulls Amelia from his harms, and holds him to the ground until the police arrive. In the course of restraining the man, Justin injures the man's shoulder, so the man sues Justin for battery. Justin argues that he did not commit battery because he was lawfully using physical force to protect his daughter. What is the likely result?

Justin will be liable for battery, because defense of self is a valid defense against battery, but defense of others is not.

Justin will not be liable for battery, because the tort of battery requires an offensive physical content of a sexual nature, and the contact in this case was not sexual.

Justin will not be liable for battery, because both defense of self and defense of others are valid defenses against battery.

Justin will be liable for battery, because neither defense of self nor defense of others is a valid defense against battery.