Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Karen ran a small office supply store in Akron, Ohio. Her main supplier was ABC Office Supply of Stamford, CT. The two parties had worked

Karen ran a small office supply store in Akron, Ohio. Her main supplier was ABC Office Supply of Stamford, CT. The two parties had worked together for a very long time. Until a dispute arose over a hastily made order by one of Karen's subordinates without her consent one day, the arrangement had been perfect. Karen felt they were overcharged for the items and ABC felt that Karen's store should have to pay for and keep the items in the order because they were special ordered items that have no use for any other buyer.

For purposes of this question only, assume that ADR did not work.As well, the employee of Karen states that he never ordered the disputed items. He said that he only called ABC to ask what they would cost for a customer that was standing in the store inquiring about those items. The only person from Karen's company that ever called to make an order from ABC was Karen. No other employees were authorized to make orders.

List all possible options that may allow Karen to escape liability on this breach of contract issue.

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

The Law Of Healthcare Administration

Authors: Stuart Showalter

9th Edition

1640551301, 978-1640551305

More Books

Students also viewed these Law questions

Question

5. It is the needs of the individual that are important.

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

3. It is the commitment you show that is the deciding factor.

Answered: 1 week ago