Ken Cosgrove (defendant) and Pete Campbell (plaintiff) are in the discovery phase of their lawsuit surrounding their breach of contract case. Pete, by and through his _ attorney, propounded 15 interrogatories on Ken 45 days ago, and to date Ken has '1 not responded, making his responses approximately two weeks late. Pete's attorney " chooses not to contact Ken or his attorney in an attempt to resolve the discovery dispute, but rather proceeds to le a motion to compel discovery with the court. Should the court consider Pete's motion to compel discovery? Why or why not? On' ,} which Rule(s) do you base your