LaTonya joins the Freewill Church, and as a member, she is not allowed to wear pants. Her employer, Salo's Seafood, requires all employees to wear coveralls provided by the company for safety reasons. Although LaTonya wore the uniform prior to joining the church, she now refuses to wear the coveralls. She explains to Sal, the owner of the restaurant, that wearing pants is against her beliefs. Sal makes an exception in her case and allows her to wear knee$-$length boots with a protective jacket, but LaTonya refuses to wear the boots. Sal fires her for insubordination. Which of the following holds true in this case?

Group of answer choices

Sal is liable for religious discrimination for failing to provide an accommodation that LaTonya would accept.

Sal is liable for religious discrimination for failing to provide a reasonable alternative.

Sal is not liable for religious discrimination because LaTonya's religious practice is not followed by any other employee at the company.

Sal is not liable for religious discrimination because he made an effort to reasonably accommodate LaTonya's religious practice.