Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Question
1 Approved Answer
Law 1 Question 1 1. The prosecutor in a Grand Jury proceeding must prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt to indict the defendant. True
Law 1 Question 1 1. The prosecutor in a Grand Jury proceeding must prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt to indict the defendant. True or False True False 10 points Question 2 1. Reasonable suspicion is enough to search a citizen's home. True or False True False 10 points Question 3 1. The court in Terry v. Ohio created an exception to the 4th Amendment, called a \"Terry Stop.\" True or False True False 10 points Question 4 1. The court in Evans v. Arizona created an exception to the 4th Amendment based on \"Good Faith.\" True or False True False 10 points Question 5 1. In New Jersey, a homeowner's curtilage extends to garbage placed at the curb for pick up. True or False True False 10 points Question 6 1. Probable Cause can best be described as: A. reasonable evidence. B. trustworthy evidence. C. sufficient evidence. D. provable evidence. 10 points Question 7 1. According to the court in Kylo, which of the following situations would require a warrant: A Using the phone company to obtain phone numbers of outgoing calls. . B. Aerial surveillance of private homes. Law 2 C. Using a technologically advanced device to explore details inside a residence from the street outside. D All of the above. . 10 points Question 8 1. The local police believe that there is a large amount of underage drinking at Bella's, a local club, and station two officers outside the club. As Peter exits the club at midnight, the officers approach him and say, "How old are you and have you been drinking?" Peter, who had been drinking, says, "I'm twenty and I just had two beers." He is later prosecuted for underage drinking. If Peter moves to suppress his statement, the court should rule it: A. inadmissable as the product of an illegal stop. B. inadmissable because Peter was not Mirandized before being asked the question. C. Admissable because the officers had reasonable suspicion for their stop of Peter. D. Admissable because Peter volunteered the information. 10 points Question 9 1. The 5th Amendment provides which constitutional safeguard for criminal defendants: A. The right not to incriminate oneself. B. The right to a fair trial. C. Double Jeopardy protection. D. All of the above. 10 points Question 10 1. In a Grand Jury proceeding: A. The defense has a right to cross examination. B. The defense has a right to present evidence. C. Neither a nor b. D. Both a and b. \f
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started