league team defends itself in this lawsuit an argues Jack assumed the risk of being hit by a t$-$shirt, why might a Missouri court disagree and rule in Jack's favor?

Whether or not a court finds Jack assumed this risk would depend on how common attending minor league baseball games is in his community.

Jack assumed the risk of being hit by a baseball, but not the risk of being hit by promotional items.

It was unexpected that the $t-$shirt fired out of a cannon could break someone's nose

Attending a minor league baseball game is not inherently risky.

This question is misleading; a Missouri court would find that Jack assumed all risks that would come from the experience of attending a sporting event and the court would rule in the minor league team's favor.

Quiz saved at $10$:$16$am