l_l_l_l 1. Individual Problems 19-1 In the late 1990s, car leasing was very popular in the United States. A customer would lease a car from the manufacturer for a set term, usually two years, and then have the option of keeping the car. If the customer decided to keep the car, the customer would pay a price to the manufacturer, the \"residual value," computed as 60% of the new car price. The manufacturer would then sell the returned cars at auction. In 1999, manufacturers lost an average of 5480 on each returned car (the auction price was, on average, $480 less than the residual value). Suppose two customers have leased cars from a manufacturer. Their lease agreements are up, and theyI are considering whether to keep (and purchase at 50% of the new car price) their cars or retun1 their cars. Two years ago, Andrew leased a car that was valued new at $17,000. If he returns the car, the manufacturer could likely get 58,670 at auction for the car. Tim also leased a car, valued new at $12,500, two years ago. If he returns the car, the manufacturer could likely get 58,750 at auction for the car. Use the followmg table to indicate whether each buyer F5 more Ierfy to purchase or return the car. Buyer Keep and Purchase Car Return Car Tim {3 C) Andrew 0 O The manufacturer Wlll lose money (at auction, relative to the residual value ofthe car) if V returns the car instead of keeping and purchasing it. True or False: Setting a more accurate residual price of each car would help attenuate the problems of adverse selection. 0 True 0 False