make literature 12-page literature review based on these Key wards, agriculture credit, repayment, the performance of agriculture credit, the impact of covid-19 on credit performance on agriculture, the role of financial institutions in agriculture credit, Citations and references, and summaries of all articles cited.

attached is the format to follow.

Abstract from the keywords. 180 words. with the following

Context and Relevance

Research question

methodology

Findings

1. Introduction

The introduction has a length of 3 pages and includes the following elements: an example from the topic Revised Problem Statement and Justification:

The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted agricultural production and supply chains globally, exacerbating the challenges faced by smallholder farmers in accessing credit. In Uganda, access to agricultural credit remains a significant challenge, with a considerable proportion of farmers relying on informal sources of credit, such as moneylenders, to finance their agricultural activities. The lack of access to affordable agricultural credit has led to low productivity and income among farmers, contributing to food insecurity and poverty. Therefore, this study aims to assess the performance of agricultural credit in Uganda and identify factors that influence credit accessibility and repayment.

Objectives:

To evaluate the performance of agricultural credit in Uganda, including the distribution of credit, repayment rates, and default rates.

To identify the determinants of agricultural credit accessibility and repayment in Uganda, including demographic, economic, and institutional factors.

To develop an econometric model toanalyze the relationship between agricultural credit and agricultural productivity in Uganda.

To assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on agricultural credit accessibility and repayment in Uganda.

Significance and Scope:

This study's significance lies in its contribution to the literature on agricultural credit performance in Uganda and the identification of factors that influence credit accessibility and repayment. The study's findings will provide policymakers and stakeholders with insights into the effectiveness of existing agricultural credit policies and interventions and inform the development of new policies to enhance credit accessibility and repayment. The study's scope will be limited to smallholder farmers in Uganda, focusing on formal and informal sources of agricultural credit.

Methodology:

The study will employ a mixed-methods approach, comprising both quantitative and qualitative methods. The study's data will be obtained from both primary and secondary sources, including household surveys, key informant interviews, and secondary data from the Bank of Uganda and other relevant institutions. The study's quantitative data will beanalyzed using descriptive statistics, regression analysis, and an econometric model, while the qualitative data will beanalyzed thematically. The study will also use a difference-in-differences approach to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on agricultural credit accessibility and repayment.

The proposed econometric model will estimate the relationship between agricultural credit and agricultural productivity using a panel dataset of smallholder farmers in Uganda. The model will control for relevant variables such as farm size, household income, education level, and credit accessibility. The model will also incorporate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on agricultural productivity and credit accessibility.this study will contribute to the understanding of agricultural credit performance in Uganda and inform policymakers and stakeholders on how to enhance credit accessibility and repayment. The study's findings will also provide insights into the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on agricultural credit in Uganda.

the a

• General and specific context of the topic
• Motivation of the specific research problem
• Justification of the scientific and societal relevance of the research problem
• Formulation of the research question in one sentence
• Explanation of the method used (systematic literature review
• Explanation of the spatial and temporal limitation or explanation of the lack of a specification
• Description of the article's structure at the end of the introduction

This section includes a description of the methodology, which is a systematic literature review based onPaul et al.'s (2021) systematic literature review: assembling, arranging, and assessing. It has

Flowchart of the article selection process using the SPAR-4 SLR protocol

Assembling		Identification Domain: Research question: Source type: Journal articles Source quality: English literature from Web of Science
	Acquisition Search mechanism and material acquisition: Web of Science Search period: Search keywords: Total number of articles returned from the search: (n=...)
Arranging		Organization Organizing codes: Organizing frameworks:
	Purification Article type excluded (and total number for each type of exclusion): reason for exclusion (duplicates etc (n=...) Article type included (and total number of articles included): (n=...)

Assessing		Evaluation Analysis method: Agenda proposal method:
	Reporting Reporting conventions: Limitation(s): Source(s) of support:

Source: Author based on the SPAR-4 SLR protocol(Paul et al., 2021, p. 6).

1. Assembling the literature

After you have identified your topic of interest, you will start with the literature review following the SPAR-4-SLR protocol byPaul et al. (2021). For the literature review, you can use Web of Science:https://www-webofscience-com.ezproxy.uni-giessen.de/wos/woscc/basic-search or tools likehttps://app.litmaps.com. You select the literature that is relevant to your topic of interest, describe the "assembling process" and specify it in the protocol (Figure 1). This section is 4 pages long.

1. Arranging the literature

Once you have selected the articles relevant to your analysis, download them and save them in a folder. Then take a first look at the content of the articles and document them according to Table 1. It is advisable that the numbering of the articles in the folder is the same as in Table 1. Create a bibliometric overview of your articles and describe them using the information you have collected in Table 1. Describe here especially the quantitative information of the articles listed in Table 1. The journal citations are available in WOS and it is advisable to note them down as soon as you download the article. This section has a length of 4 pages.

List of articles reviewed.

No	Articles	Year	Journal Citations	Theory	Method	Sample	Region	Research focus	Period	Years
1
2
3...