Miss Haversham, a guest at a wedding catered by Giardias Fine Foods, became wolenty il$,$ as cid several other guess. a was later found that only those who ate the crab salad appetizer became il$,$ if Miss Haversham were to sue for negligence, she would normally have to prove Da$.$ that Giardias was stricty liable for her injuries.

$0)$ b$.$ that Giardia's failure to live up to the dury of care which it owed to her led directy to her injuries. $)$ c$.$ that Glardias had a dury of care, which it failed by its actions to serve her food that was ht to eat

d$.$ that Giardia's had a duty of care, which it talled by its actions, to serve her food that was it to eat and that Garalas failure to live up to the dury of care, which it owed to her, led directy to her injunes.

e$.$ that Glardia's had a duty of care, which it failed by its actions to serve her food that was it to eat and that Giardia's failure to live up to the duty of care, which it owed to her, led directly to her injuries. The plaintif must also prove failure to live up to the duty of care, which it owed to her, led directly to her injuries. The plaintill must also prove causation.