MULTIPLE CHOICES:

Question 24 (1 point) In researching the law related to her claim, Anju's lawyer nds the following: 1.) a case from the Alberta Court of Appeal that supports Anju's position; 2.) a case from the Supreme Court of Canada (The appeal of the decision in 1.) that does not support Anju's position; 3.) a law recently passed by the Alberta government that supports Anju's position (the Alberta government passed the law in response to the Supreme Court decision in 2.) Which of the laws above will be determinative in Anju's case? Another way of asking this question is, which of the laws above 1.),2.),or 3.) is going to be the most important in deciding the outcome of Anju's matter? Question 25 (1 point) In researching the law related to her claim, Anju's lawyer nds the following: 1.) a case from the Alberta Court of Appeal that supports Anju's position; 2.) a case from the Supreme Court of Canada (The appeal of the decision in 1.) that does not support Anju's position; 3.) a law recently passed by the Alberta government that supports Anju's position (the Alberta government passed the law in response to the Supreme Court decision in 2.) Which of the following correctly describes the nature of the laws mentioned above? O 1.) case law, 2.) case law, 3.)common law 0 1.)case law, 2.) case law, 3.)precedent O 1.)|egislation, 2.)|egislation, 3.)common law 0 1.)common law, 2.)common law, 3.)legislation Question 26 (1 point) Michel accidentally runs over a pedestrian while he is on vacation in Medicine Hat. Michel lives in Calgary, but the pedestrian he ran over lives in Ontario. After some initial urgent medical care in Alberta, the pedestrian went home to Ontario. The pedestrian has decided to sue Michel. Answers are weighted equally. (A) The pedestrian will choose which jurisdiction they prefer to sue in by filing a statement of claim in that jurisdiction B) The pedestrian can sue Michel in Alberta OC) The pedestrian can sue Michel in Ontario (D) The pedestrian can sue Michel in Alberta and Ontario at the same timelearn.sait.ca C + BLAW MIDTERM Fall 2020 X Time Limit: 4:00:00 Time Left:3:21:51 Kim Do: Attempt 1 Page 1: ( D) The pedestrian can sue Michel in Alberta and Ontario at the same time T. 2 3 Question 27 (1 point) Beatrice was accidentally run over by her BLAW instructor. Initially, Beatrice felt ok, 4 5 6 but within a few months she started to experience pain in her neck. After consulting a doctor, Beatrice learns that the accident has caused serious damage. Beatrice decides to talk to a lawyer. Assuming the limitation period started to run when