Murphy contracts in February $2017$ with Betsy the Bride to decorate a venue for a wedding for $$1200"$on or before June $1,2017$ for the wedding reception on June $2."$ On June $1,$ Murphy's delivery van was involved in an accident, and the materials for assembling the planned decorations were damaged. Murphy fails to secure new materials in time to assemble the decorations because he had other decorating commitments. As a result, the venue is not decorated in time for the reception, and Betsy the bride is suing because she had to pay a high rush fee to another decorator to get the job done in time. In this situation, Betsy:

Cannot sue for damages because the oral contract with Murphy was for more than $$1200$ and needed to be in writing.

Can sue for damages because the oral contract is enforceable, and Murphy's nonperformance is not excused by objective impossibility.

Cannot sue for damages because Murphy's nonperformance was excused the substitution of another decorator.

Cannot sue for damages because Murphy's nonperformance was excused by an accident that was not Murphy's fault.