Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Murphy contracts in February 2017 with Betsy, the bride to decorate a venue for a wedding for $1200 on or before June 1, 2017 for

Murphy contracts in February 2017 with Betsy, the bride to decorate a venue for a wedding for $1200 on or before June 1, 2017 for the wedding reception on June 2 on June 1 Murphy's delivery van was involved in an accident, and the materials were assembling. The plan decorations were damaged. Murphy fails to secure new materials in time to assemble the decorations because he had other decorating commitments, as a result, the venue was not decorated in time for the reception and Betsy the bride is suing because she had to pay a rush fee to another decorator to get the job done in time and this situation. Betsy can see for damages because the oral contract is enforceable and Murphy non-performance is not executed by objective impossibility cannot super damages because Murphy's not performance was executed by an accident that was not Murphy's fault cannot see damages because Murphy's not performance was executed by the substantial of another decorator cannot super damages because the oral contract with Murphy was for more than $1200 and needed to be in writing

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image_2

Step: 3

blur-text-image_3

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Smith and Roberson Business Law

Authors: Richard A. Mann, Barry S. Roberts

15th Edition

1285141903, 1285141903, 9781285141909, 978-0538473637

More Books

Students also viewed these Law questions