Question
Musician Says Katy Perry's 'Dark Horse' Copyright Infringement Verdict Sets A 'Dangerous Precedent' August 14, 2019 by Jeremy Hobson & Serena McMahon A recent California
Musician Says Katy Perry's 'Dark Horse' Copyright Infringement Verdict Sets A 'Dangerous Precedent'
August 14, 2019 by Jeremy Hobson & Serena McMahon
A recent California jury decision in a copyright infringement lawsuit has many in the music world worried.
The case found that the writers of Katy Perry's 2013 hit "Dark Horse" featuring Juicy J had copied a part of a 2008 song called "Joyful Noise" by Christian hip-hop artist Flame.
The jury awarded Flame nearly $2.8 million in damages. "Dark Horse" writers and producers Perry, Dr. Luke, Sarah Hudson, Juicy J, Max Martin and Cirkut called the decisiona "travesty of justice," according to Variety.
"There is no infringement. There was no access of substantial similarity," the writers said in a statement.
Popular Youtuber and musicianAdam Neelyagrees that the case was unfairly decided. He says the ruling "sets a dangerous precedent" in the music industry.
He and other musicians he knows are "pretty scared" of the wider implications this case may cause, because the part of the song that came under scrutiny is "such a small little melodic fragment that I don't feel like it is unique to 'Joyful Noise,' " he says.
The two songs don't share the same melody, chord progression or drum groove, he explains. But they do share a similar ostinato, which Merriam-Webster describes as "a musical figure repeated persistently at the same pitch throughout a composition." Neely argues the ostinato isn't a significant part of the song.
"In this case, the jury found that there was a striking similarity between the two pieces of music," he says. "Now the problem from my perspective is that you could find that same striking similarity between any number of different kinds of music [and] any number of different pieces of music throughout history."
To make his point, Neely took a couple of other well-known pieces of music and used a synthesizer to show how similar they could be to "Joyful Noise."
Neely foresees a difficult path forward, saying that if the jury's copyright ruling is applied to every piece of music, the music industry will be in a "morass of copyright infringement laws."
Questions:
1. Describe the situation in the article.
2. What is the intellectual property?
3. Describe the type of IP.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started