Note how "schools of thought" here compare to "schools of thought $($philosophies$)"$ in your textbook, specifically:

Formalism $=$ Historical

Realism $=$ Sociological

Positivism $=$ Command

Naturalism $=$ Natural

Read the article found in Project $1\mathrm{.}4$ "You Mean They Ate Them?" $($next page$)$

TOPIC POSTS $($Category A$)$:

For three $(3)$ sut of six $(6)$ possible points,

Respond to the following two Questions with on$-$topic, researched replies.

Your response need not be correct, but must be on$-$topic.

Refer to the philosophies by quoting and citing ONLY your textbook. Penalties applied if you quote and cite to anything other than your textbook for the philosophies. $($In this project, certainly quote or paraphrase the Justices, but since all participants must read that article $($the case itself$),$ the "rule of thumb" in quoting a case study is not to cite it$.$ We've all read it$,$ in other words, and no one needs to tell the reader how to find it via a citation. Furthermore, the case does not reference any philosophy$).$

Write $($cut & paste$)$ in your message$($s$)$ as your Subject Line, EXACTLY the following:

$(1)$ XX$\text{'}$s Topic Post $($Category A$)$

Question $1$:

From the case itself, what was the outcome of the case? In other words, what conclusion did the appellate court reach regarding the trial court's decision?

Question $2$: