On April 1 5, Melania Crump, a wellknown business executive, received a letter from the La Donald Gallery, which stated: 'We hereby offer to sell you the original stained glass panel, entitled Starry Day, by the famed artist Ivana, for $97 5,000. This offer will expire on May 1. (signed) Helga La Donald. Crump, who liked to bargain, wrote back: \"I'm very interested in your offer. \"fill you include a professional cleaning of the panel? (signed) Melania Crump.\" La Donald received this letter on April 13 but did not respond to it. By April 25, Crump was in serious nancial difculties and realized she could not afford to buy the painting. She mailed the following letter to La Donald, \"Since you have rudely failed to respond to my earlier letter, please be advised that I have no intention ofbuying the stained glass panel Starry Day from you. (signed) Melania Crump. La Donald received this letter on April 23. On April 26, however, Crump found out that she was the sole winner of a $342 million Megazillions lotto jackpot. That day, she gave the following letter to Federal Express for delivery to La Donald the next day: \"I hereby accept your offer to buy the stained glass panel Starry Day, by Ivana, for $9 75,000. (signed) Melania Crump.\" Due to an error by Federal Express, La Donald did not receive this letter until April 30. On May 3, Crump called La Donald to ask when the stained glass panel would be delivered to her. La Donald responded that there was no contract between Crump and La Donald and that the stained glass panel had been sold to someone else. Crump sues La Donald for breach of contract. Judgment for whom? Discuss, explaining the signicance ofeach communication between Crump and La Donald