On October 24, 2013, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that a tipster who provided legal payments to foreign government officials by Stryker coporation under the Foreign Corrupt Pracice ct CPA) was non dighe to recerye a Dodd-Frank award because his information was provided before the act went into effect in 2010 Stryker had made those payments between August 2003 and February 2008. The commission ruled the company had incorrectly described the unlawful payments in its books and records and failed to devise and maintain an adequate system of internal accounting controls, as required under the FCPA. Stryker was fined $13.3 million: $7.5 million in disgorgement; $2.3 million in prejudgment interest; and a $3.5 million civil penalty. Do you believe the court's opinion was ethical from a to the SEC about i fairness perspective? From a rights perspective? Explain