One example of exceeding the appropriate authority for prosecution or defense isdestroying evidence. No prosecutor would destroy evidence proving a defendant committed acrime. Prosecutors have the most influence in courtrooms. Prosecutors must prove guilt beyond areasonable doubt. The destruction of evidence that could prove a defendant is guilty is notacceptable as it is their responsibility. An acquittal can result from the destruction of evidence.An attorney or prosecutor destroying evidence is both immoral and unethical, plus illegal. "First,it can lead to wholly innocent individuals being convicted of crimes they did not commit."(Hanson, 2023). A prosecutor or defense attorney shouldn't withhold the truth. 1 John 2:21, "Idon't write to you because you don't know the truth but because you know it. You know that nolie comes from the truth." (Common English Bible, 2013). As a result, a guilty individual wouldremain free. Attorneys should protect client information. Any information implicating a clientwould be immoral. Legal representation creates a fair society. The same standards apply toprosecutors. It is his or her duty to ensure justice is done. "Violations of the law must beprosecuted, but in a way that guarantees that the defendant's rights are respected and protected."(Neubauer and Fradella, 2019). A prosecutor or defendant's attorney taking such actions is arisky move. Bringing facts to light, defending clients, and ensuring justice are served areimperative for attorneys. Ultimately, God leads everyone down their path. Legitimacy dependson the court system exercis