only hand written answers I need otherwise dnt answer plz it's a request ..I will downvote if you send wrong answer or non handwritten answers!! nd I will give upvote for handwritten!!

Opportunities exist for federal scientists and engineers to work on a contract basis. John works hard and is a dedicated employee. He is attracted to specifics, stares him down and kills him, or casts a tangential gaze at him. After all is said and done, the project is either not completed or the results are too late to be of use. Mr Jones is a minority member who is well regarded by his peers as being technically proficient, and he is frequently approached in his field of expertise. This document provides crucial guidance and support throughout these discussions. Mr. Brown, the new director of the Division where Mr. Jones works, is having the same difficulties with him as Mr. Jones's predecessor was having with him. A outstanding issue in Mr. Jones's rights and grievance procedure does not appear to be able to be resolved by him. He expressed real dissatisfaction with the former division chief. Mr Brown recognises that it is his obligation to assist Mr Jones in achieving success. He pondered limiting Mr Jones's difficulty and breadth of work, but he recognised that Jones was going to pursue topics that were worthy of his abilities and that he was using the complaints system to ensure that the system remained equitable. The case's question is as follows: He isn't one of them. The following are the specifics of the situation: Mr. Jones is employed as a research analyst for a federal agency. Even though he has been employed by the government for twenty years, he has only been in his current job for ten of those years. He has a B.S. and an M.S. in engineering, which is on par with the bulk of his contemporaries in terms of education. Within a few months of commencing his new position, he was promoted to his current post. This degree is widely recognised as the industry standard.