Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Question
1 Approved Answer
P commenced an action against D in a State X court of general jurisdiction. D is a citizen of State Z and P is a
P commenced an action against D in a State X court of general jurisdiction. D is a citizen of State Z and P is a citizen of State X. D owned a boat which he kept at a pier in Houston, Texas. Pursuant to Texas law, P obtained an attachment against D's boat. When properly served with notice of the attachment, D moved to quash it. The boat is probably worth $20,000. P's action is for breach of contract and alleges damages in the amount of $1 5,000. Which of the following statements is correct? Question 27Select one: a. The attachment should be quashed, if a Texas court could not constitutionally assume personal jurisdiction over D. b. Pre-judgment attachments are, per se, unconstitutional. c. If D's motion was denied, P could apply all of the proceeds from sale of the boat to his/her obligation. d. Choices A and B are correct, but not C
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started