Question
Participants were randomly assigned roles of proposer and accepter/responder. The situation in the first three rounds (treatment 1) is that individuals solely act out of
Participants were randomly assigned roles of proposer and accepter/responder. The situation in the first three rounds (treatment 1) is that individuals solely act out of self interest and player 2 has no power to reject the offer of player 1 and in the last three rounds (treatment 2) player 1 has just two strategies: propose a fair split (50/50) or unfair split (70/30) and player 2 has the power to either accept or reject the offer. Recall that only integer amounts out of the hypothetical $10 could have been offered by the proposer to the responder (0-10). What is the theoretical prediction about the split of money for each treatment? How do the results in Figure 1 compare with the theoretical prediction? How would you explain the differences, if any?
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started