Performance Assessment Assignment: Polly Plates, Inc. (PPI) v.7 Polly Peyrotte started designing and decorating fine china plates more than 100 years ago. As her artistry caught on, she became famous. She also had good business sense and what started as one creative womans design studio became Polly Plates, Inc. (PPI), with millions of dollars in annual revenue. As the years went by, Pollys daughters and granddaughters became involved in the business. When Polly retired, they hired talented designers who built on Pollys designs to continue the companys fine china tradition. In recent decades, fewer and fewer family members have gone into the business and non-family managers are now running most parts of the operation. Some of these professional managers also now serve on the board of directors. The few family members who remain on the board have become concerned about the business profitability in recent years and its potential for future growth. They worry, for example, that the delicate flowers and landscapes that were a mainstay of the companys designs in the past might no longer appeal to todays collectors. Anna Slevnik, vice president of marketing and one of the remaining family members involved in running the company, defended those designs at a recent board meeting. Anna noted that, many of the plate designs feature acanthus leaves which have adorned the worlds best architecture and most beautifully illuminated manuscripts for more than two millennia they are timeless! At the 20x0 year-end board meeting (held in February of 20x1), the companys controller, Robin Aul, reported that in calendar 20x0, PPI sold 15 million plates at an average price of $3/plate. The plates have total variable manufacturing costs (including direct materials, direct labor, and variable manufacturing overhead) of $1.40/plate. The company has a fixed manufacturing overhead cost of $22 million per year. Much of this overhead is rent paid to various Peyrotte family members who have inherited, as personal assets, the real estate (land and buildings) in which the company manufactures and warehouses plates. Gareth Snyder, a tax advisor to Polly in the 1930s, used to preach, hold depreciating assets in the company, but hold appreciating assets in your personal portfolios and rent them to the company. The good news about PPIs high fixed manufacturing costs is that they do provide enough capacity to make 60 million plates a year (which could come in handy if demand ever returns to the lofty levels of years gone by). In addition, the company has selling and administrative costs (all fixed) of $3 million per year. Robin noted that the 20x0 beginning and ending inventories of plates were both zero. She suggested that the firm might be losing sales and should consider keeping more plates in inventory to meet sudden increases in demand. Anna responded, I believe controllers should stick to bean counting and leave important sales and distribution decisions to those who are experienced in such matters. She then added, Harrumph! The companys president, Barbara Boxtuttle, had hired consultant Deb Bett in October, 20x0, when she realized the company was likely to show a net loss for the year that would end in December, 20x0. Earlier in the day (of the board meeting), Barbara had received the consultants report and was not happy. The report concluded that the company needed a new president. Further, the report recommended hiring Ms. Bett as a temporary president. The report said she was someone who could really turn the business around. Deb, when discussing her report at the board meeting, said her analysis showed strong evidence that PPIs customer base was no longer intact (her report used the phrase dying off) and that the company needed to explore new markets. Over Annas groans, Deb said, In addition to the lovely plates the company has been selling for a century, we should open an exciting new market by printing funny sayings, slogans, and political messages on the plates. To do this, we must open new marketing channels, ramp up production to fill those channels, and spend more on advertising as we move into new markets. Every time Deb said we, Barbara winced. A lively discussion among the board members ensued, ending with a motion, duly seconded, to adopt the reports recommendation. The motion passed with only one nay vote (Barbaras). At the end of its regular meeting, the board thanked Barbara for her years of devoted service, fired her, and asked her to leave the building immediately. After a brief recess, the board reconvened in special session and voted unanimously to elect Deb president and charged her with implementing the companys foray into new markets and making the company profitable once again. To show her confidence, Deb agreed to a one-year contract, which provided that, if Deb managed to show a profit at the end of one year (20x1), PPI would offer her an additional year. Further, Deb agreed to work for an annual salary of $1 plus a bonus of 20% of annual net income. No profits, no bonus. Robin (the controller) made sure that Debs employment contract included a provision that defined net income, for purposes of the contract as net income calculated before taxes using absorption costing, noting that, after all, absorption costing is GAAP, and GAAP basis net income is what our auditors and bankers would expect to see in a contract like this. I know other ways of calculating net income, but we are Pollys Plates and our tradition is to use only the best materials, most skilled workers, and the finest accounting principles, too! In 20x1, Deb implemented her plan. She hired new staff to write the funny sayings (for some reason, these new, younger people called them memes), slogans and political messages to go on the plates, launched three different advertising campaigns (one for each of the new marketing channels) and trained PPI salespeople to call on the types of customers who would be interested in the new plate designs. As promised, she increased production to fill the new marketing channels. PPI manufactured 50 million plates in 20x1 and sold 18 million of them, a 20% increase in unit sales over 20x0. Deb told everyone on the board that she was thrilled with the sales growth and was happy to have so many plates in inventory at the end of 20x1. She said she believed that fresh orders would be pouring in the moment her new salespeople developed the new selling channels fully. She firmly believed that the large ending inventory would come in handy for quick shipments as the demand would, she was sure, increase rapidly. Doing all this product development and opening new sales channels was, of course, expensive. The fixed selling and administrative expenses (including Barbaras severance package and Debs $1 salary) more than doubled from $3 million in 20x0 to $7 million in 20x1. Fortunately, through what Deb described as a firm hand on operating costs and careful attention to competitors price points, she kept variable costs per plate and the plates average selling price the same as in 20x0. One year later At the year-end board meeting for 20x1 (held in February 20x2), everyone was jubilant over the sharp rise in sales and the financial results. Robin (the controller) provided a draft financial statement that showed a net income of $13,880,000 (before taxes and Debs bonus). Celebratory champagne and caviar were served. The controller handed Deb a check for $2,776,000 and the entire board gave her a standing ovation while chanting, One more year, one more year! After thanking the board for the opportunity to show what a little fresh thinking could do for a company that had been so stuck in the past (and for the big fat bonus check), Deb expressed her regrets that she would be unable to accept PPIs offer to continue in the Presidents position for a second year. She explained that she would be on the next flight to Frostbite Falls, Minnesota to take on her next challenge. Jay Ward, CEO of struggling cereal manufacturer Kernel Mills, had heard of Debs success at PPI and has asked her to help them turn around their business. The board was disappointed, but felt that Deb was leaving them in a great position to carry her brilliant idea into a future of profitability and boundless growth and toasted to her continued success in helping companies turn themselves around.

Requirements:

Prepare four income statements in reasonably good form for Polly Plates, including both absorption and variable costing income statements for 20x0 and 20x1.

From the absorption costing (also known as the GAAP or external financial reporting format) income statement for Polly Plates 20x0 year, provide the amount of net income (or loss) calculated.

One of the board members, hearing of the net loss expected for 20x0 at the first board meeting described above, asked whether anyone knew how many plates the company would need to sell to break even. Calculate PPIs breakeven point (in plates) using 20x0s cost structure. Recall that a companys cost structure is its selling price per unit, variable cost per unit, and total fixed cost.

Another board member at the 20x0 meeting responded to that query, asking, Who cares what it takes to make zero net income? Id like to know what sales would be necessary to make $2 million a year as we did in the old days! Harrumph! Calculate the sales (in plates) PPI needed to yield a net income of $2 million, using 20x0s cost structure.

As the discussion about breakeven points and profit planning wound down, an elderly board member awoke from his nap, saw the breakeven charts on the projection screen, and mumbled something about direct costing. His granddaughter (also on the board and a recent MBA graduate) responded by saying, Wait! I think I remember that term. Yes, in fact, you can make a whole income statement using direct costing. In Professor Blatterfitzels class, we called it variable costing or the contribution margin format income statement, or something like that. Refer to the income statement you prepared for PPIs 20x0 year using variable costing (also called direct costing or the contribution margin format) and state the amount of net income (or net loss) calculated. How is this different from the one calculated from GAAP?

Calculate PPIs 20x1 ending inventory amount (under absorption costing) in both plates and dollars using calculations you performed when creating the absorption costing income for that year.

Why are the two PPI 20x1 income statements prepared using variable costing (also called direct costing or contribution margin format costing) and absorption different amounts of net income (or net loss).