Peter Beraty Assignment: Analyzet Legal Reasoning for Chapter 10 o Frank Hill suffered from Alrheimer's disease. Duringabospital stay for surgery unrelated to the Altheimer's. Hill sig edacontract coveyingbisfarm tohis e,Herry edNorwan, shares. Harry received a larger share than Norman, Norman asked to set the contret aside, daiming that his father was not mentally oompetent when he signed it At the trial, a physician, a prychiatrist, and an attorney all testified that when they had signed consequences of his actions Another psychiatrist, however, Frank at various times in the prior year, he had hem tinable tohandle finasial the contract. testified that Frank had lueidinterale, and the bonpitalschant ates refleetelthat Frank hadludliaterala the Laatly, the attorney who drafted the contrart tated that Frankunderstood what he was sining and awerethatle wwsprating mereoftheprNewsai mth How would a court most likely rule on the enforceability ofthis contract contract was void because Frakwes mentalyincomoetent due toAutemets disease O b. The court most likely held that the contract was veidatie, r Frank was mentaly incomperert at the time he signed the contract, O The court most likely held that the contract was maid, because the unequal property atrbution O d. The court most likely held that the contract was vald, because Frank was mentally incompetent at the time he sgyed ee areact. 1133273564 30927- doc e 113327 asse 368274 ooc