Place your answer in the space provided. 1) In June 2017 Rhonda, a CPA, lands a job in the tax department of Price Waterhouse after graduating from Harvard Law School. The parties orally agreed that Rhonda was to work for the firm for the next 5 years, and the irm will also pay Rhonda's tuition if she wants to further her education. Later that year, Rhonda attends New York University Law School to pursue an advanced law degree specializing in taxation. After Rhonda graduated from NYU in March 2019 she resigns from the firm. Price Waterhouse then sues to recover the $69,057 it spent for Rhonda's tuition. In this case a: Price Waterhouse wins since both parties had the necessary capacity. b: Price Waterhouse can compel Rhonda to perform the remainder of the contract c: Rhonda is not liable, & walks away free & clear d: Rhonda must agree to a buyout before she can take another job. 2) Marion paints beautiful portraits using both oil & paint pastels. You have seen and admired her work for years. You contact Marion and commission her to paint a portrait of your cat, Howard. You agree to pay her $7,500 After sitting with Howard for several hours Marion decides that Howard is the nastiest, foulest, most rancid smelling feline she had the misfortune of trying to paint. She in turn, arranges for her friend Gerald to paint Howard instead. Marion's act is an attempted: a: Assignment b: Revocation c: Termination d: Delegation 3) Wilson owns property close to the beach. His land, however, does not have direct access to the beach. Wilson's neighbor, Greta, owns property that for the right to lay a 3 foot wide brick path from the edge of his property, Wilson will be able to use the path whenever he chooses. Wilson gives does have access to the beach. Wilson orally agrees to pay Greta $10,000 across her land, and to the beach. Under the terms of the agreement, Greta a $10,000 certified check. After 6 months, Greta pulls up the path and tells Wilson to get lost. Wilson sues Greta for continued access to the beach on the grounds that this is an enforceable contract for an interest in land. On these facts: a: Greta prevails because this contract should be in writing. b: Wilson prevails because he has proof of payment. c: Neither party prevails because Wilson's claim will be dismissed and Greta will have to give Wilson his money back d: None of the above